Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Drive
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Club Drive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable software, prod removed. WuhWuzDat 16:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is in terrible shape, but the game was from a major publisher for a major console and that gives it notability. TJ Spyke 17:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. TJ Spyke 17:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep though perhaps more remembered for being among the worst-reviewed games of its generation than for anything else, this is notable as a published console game from a major publisher. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per reviews listed on Mobygames. Nifboy (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Nifboy. The Mobygames page lists 10 reviews. Joe Chill (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite. There are several major press reviews (as noted by Nifboy) and the publisher is notable (as noted by TJ Spyke). Meets WP:N. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – notability easily established here, despite the clear User:Mcjakeqcool-type editing. –MuZemike 22:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and fix - subject is notable due to enough coverage by reliable sources. The article is atrocious right now and needs work though. Cocytus [»talk«] 15:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.