Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Beer Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Club Beer Party[edit]

A hangon rationale on this article made me reconsider my speedy tag, however I still do not see that this club meets our requirements for having an article in Wikipedia. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems to fail WP:SOURCES; the listed publications are dubious. I could find neither the Arlington Connection nor the Sun-Gazette article online (though that does not completely rule them out). Multiple Google searches only returned me to a copy of the article at NationMaster. If the club has indeed "been frequently discussed on the popular Late Night Shots website" (where?) and "been successful in getting celebrities to attend events," (who?) as well as gained exposure in the local media," (when?) there needs to be solid evidence of these claims, as well as evidence that those sources can support notability, before I would consider keeping any part of this. Luinfana (talk) 07:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not every publication has their sources online. I've even come across a newspaper that deletes online articles after 6 months. I did come across a paper called Sun-Gazette once, but there's probably more by that name. Anyway, unless those turn out to not exist or actually be unreliable, I don't think deleting this is a good idea unless paper sources have been dug up. - Mgm|^(talk) 23:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.