Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clover Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to JoJo (singer). People weren't specific about their desired Merge target except this article. If you would like to propose a different Merge target, please propose it on the article talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clover Music

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page does not meet WP:NCOMPANY and there's multiple issues. The formation section is basically a collection of repeated information (multiple points are mentioned more than once). Much of the "history" information is copied from the artists' page and also pages about the respective albums' pages. Furthermore the discography section is entirely lifted from JoJo discography. Pages about record labels should only exist when there is significant information about the actual operations of the label. This isn't a record label, its an imprint where the artist owns their own masters. There's no significant information about the imprint other than why it was formed. The page is not required and should be redirected to the artist's page. There are no other artists signed to the 'label'. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge...Merge...Merge!!! For some reason, people keep bringing obvious record label merge targets to AfD, as if the better solution would be to have a redlink here. it's not, and it's much less administrative burden to initiate a merge than to drag yet more articles through the protracted deletion process. This label has one artist, whose article is most certainly never leaving this encyclopedia; you know what to do. Chubbles (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: We don't have an article about JoJo's car, or JoJo's toilet. The label being nearly entirely dependent on the founding artist's work means that this should be a paragraph in Levesque's biography, nothing more. - Here Under The Oaks (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (selectively) to JoJo (singer). The faux annoyance above is not justified because a discussion here can help solidify consensus in the event of a re-re-redirect war. Anyway, since this label is all JoJo and nobody else, its corporate history can be described in one paragraph or so at her article. No need to merge all the chart info and release histories because that stuff is already at JoJo's discography article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge. Looks like this could fully fit under the main JoJo article without losing any information for now, but if any other artist gets signed to it it should be spun back off. Abeg92contribs 22:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.