Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudreach (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Cloudreach

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Cloudreach
• Articles for deletion/Cloudreach (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cloudreach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2A02:6B6B:16C:0:D8BF:FBCC:5819:FF15 proposed deletion with the rationale:

Reads like promotional material or like the About page of the company. Probably conflict of interest. No substance.

However, since Cloudreach was discussed at AfD before, PROD cannot be used. I have converted this to an AfD for them. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: This was previously deleted and for good reasons. Most reliable sources are not about the company but about bigger companies who bought the business, and even those are flimsy and don't justify an article about this. Additionally the company website doesn't even exist anymore which is another reason to think this doesn't pass WP:N. 2A02:6B6B:58:0:F935:2F9:817C:F0F4 (talk) 18:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

  Are you the same person who proposed deletion? (The first two segments of the IPv6 addresses are identical.) If so, you need to disclose this fact, to avoid creating an illusion of support (WP:BADSOCK). jlwoodwa (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

  Yes I am. Didn't mean to trick anybody (IP was changed by ISP) but indeed I should have mentioned it in my response. 2A02:6B6B:58:0:F935:2F9:817C:F0F4 (talk) 10:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks, and sorry if I came across as too confrontational. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

* Delete - insufficient sources to merit inclusion. WmLawson (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as one Delete vote is from the nominator and this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion due to earlier AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge with Atos: Seems to be fine to incorporate a small section into the Atos article. Oaktree b (talk) 04:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

  Or !delete if not merging, I'm ok with that as well. Oaktree b (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merger is possible but all the sources are WP:ORGTRIV so I'm not even sure it's worth that or a redirect. Based on the thinness of the available sourcing, delete. Dclemens1971 (talk) 07:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.