Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud-nine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cloud Nine. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud-nine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable, but the awards could point the notability if referenced. reddogsix (talk) 00:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cloud Nine. The company isn't notable, and it's a mystery to me why the nominator is edit warring if he agrees enough to PROD it - but it happens that this is a likely search term for readers who are looking for one of the items listed on Cloud Nine. 172.9.22.150 (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A children's company in a school. Not a worthwhile search term. Szzuk (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cloud Nine. buff bills 7701 19:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.