Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closing logos of Columbia Pictures Television (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Merging some of the content is still an option if consensus on the destination talk page allows. Petros471 20:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closing logos of Columbia Pictures Television (2nd nomination)

Although the first nomination was closed recently with a no consensus vote 1, the relisting is due to that the fairly similar and the equal importance of the pages for the logos of Columbia-Tristar Television, Tristar Television ended in a delete vote. On my talk page, the admin that closed the vote told me that I should persue more action, and the deletion review have said it is fine to relist. The original nomination had very few votes, and the precedent was not created. Renosecond 05:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Convert the the article's content into a table, and then merge it into Columbia Pictures Television.--TBCTaLk?!? 05:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Convert and merge as per TBC but only the 3 or 4 distinct logos - the red/yellow pretzel, the Abstract Torch, maybe the oldest and then the modern version of the lady with lamp logo. We don't need the 3 minor variations on the old lady with lamp logo - thats crufty Bwithh 12:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm a bit confused and fairly disapointed of the merge votes. There has already been a precedent established that the Tristar and Columbia-Tristar television logo pages are not notable, so why should this be kept as well? It's about the same importance. Renosecond 19:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is there a more crufty topic on Wikipedia than closing TV logos? I could maybe see a gallery of old logos in the Columbia Pictures Television article, but this is ridiculous. Kirjtc2 13:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any encyclopedic info with Columbia Pictures Television. —tregoweth (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Ogdred 22:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge whatever is informative. Arbusto 22:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Many TV station articles include limited information on old logos. -- NORTH ^talk 08:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
QuestionThen how come the Screen Gems closing logos, the Viacom closing logos and the MGM logo articles are up? Why not just help me clean the CPT closing logo article?

Comment Well, they haven't been proposed for deletion yet, but considering a few articles of the like have already been deleted, this may well be soon. And also, could the voters look at the precedent of the 2 deleted pages and understand that merging really won't help any matters. Renosecond 02:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article as OR/Youtubecruft, some of the images could be merged into the main article per Bwithh. ~ trialsanderrors 17:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just like Paramount Television, why not use the images and put them under the Columbia Pictures Television article as a gallery.
Delete merging a table into Columbia Pictures Television per TBC is the best way to preserve any encyclopedic information, Tewfik^Talk 19:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.