Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Close Up (1996 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close Up (1996 film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 18:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources that would lend to the view that this is a notable work.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being Will Arnett's debut doesn't stop this from failing WP:NFILM. Has zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 06:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Rothen Tomatoes is not valid source, as it ratins can skew the public consensus about invidual films with poor or great reviews that are not based on the reality of film's actual quality, but with that said if IMDB (not valid source eather) page is anything to go by this film was shoot on 16mm, which higlight that this film was probably never intended for any kind of theatrical release. That in on itself knocks down the notability let alone the fact that its not DTV sequel to previous theatrical release DoctorHver (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.