Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clodagh Cooney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clodagh Cooney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE. Contested prod. External links do not appear to be directly relevant to the player in the article and the reference is to the club website. noq (talk) 18:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Snappy (talk) 00:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Subject has played camogie at inter-county level for Dublin, which is the highest level at which camogie is played. Therefore subject meets WP:ATHLETE. Teester (talk) 12:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Is that a professional level team? I don't think that qualifies as wp:athlete. Even if it does, more importantly, are there sources to that extent. if there are, I'll change my vote. (if my lack of a ! in front bothers you, then tell me, we'll chat.) Shadowjams (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless she plays at a fully professional level, she fails WP:ATH. She is not the subject of any of this coverage, so she fails WP:GNG. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IMHO, subject does not warrant an article. This content would best be used in an article on several notable camogie players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadManCF (talk • contribs) 17:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RadmanCF. JBsupreme (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.