Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clivedon Road Highams Park London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clivedon Road Highams Park London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Conpletely ordinary street in London. PROD removed with no explanation. TheLongTone (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication of notability.--Charles (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I might be wondering why a large section was missing from Google maps. Otherwise, there is nothing about this road that distinguishes itself from every other road in London. Periglio (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. Jeh (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG XXX antiuser ^eh? 03:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But i believe it has nobility and it is here to model a example of a perfectly common road, common roads that seem to have no notability need a legend and i believe Clivedon road can be the leader to show that ordiary roads do exist and without reference they would not exist. This is a model example only. I believe that the cliveden road wikipedia page i have made should be put on wikipedia to expand the encyclopedia website, it is original , and will be seen as a good example as i do not think the idea would take off on wikipedia for everyone to put a road on a wikipedia, this is a example only i have made and a living example of a real road and not under the definition of of a "road " page it should stay as a example "that roads do exist" i have no intention of making lots of wikipedia pages with different road names this Clivedon Rd page is for reference But this does not mean because this road is for reference, and is unique in the way that "it is a real road" and not a page giving definition of the word "road" and therefore i would not object to people putting streets, and roads on wikipedia for what ever reason they want to do it for just because i am doing it for reference. ThankyouJohn Johnstone Smith (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.