Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clip The Apex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clip The Apex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any reliable sources to indicate that this is a notable website. Mattg82 (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 01:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable website. oyasumi (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 04:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no notability. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage found in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:WEB. Gongshow ^Talk 05:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.