Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint Curtis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clint Curtis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perennial candidate fails WP:NPOL. Not notable for making whistleblower complaints either. Reads like a collection of controversies and a collection of stale news blurbs. KidAd • SPEAK 22:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If " During that same year, Curtis's accusations against Yang were the subject of a series of articles in the Daytona Beach News-Journal" is correct, with other whistleblower coverage, might be notable for that.

Delete, per WP:TNT. I don't often make this argument, but this article is an unqualified disaster as a BLP, and if I were writing it I would start completely from scratch. Vanamonde (Talk) 11:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.