Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton Hill Community Music Centre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clifton Hill Community Music Centre[edit]
- Clifton Hill Community Music Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm sure this community music centre did noble things but there is nothing to suggest it meets WP:ORG. coverage is very limited and lacking indepth. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. 13:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC) — The-Pope (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hey, I love the idea - an "anarchically" managed, free rehearsal/performance venue - but it only existed for seven years, and it doesn't seem to have garnered much attention then or since. Fails WP:GNG. --MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it may have been known as the Clifton Hill Community Music Centre by some people for some of the time but, as the article explains, it was run anarchically and did not have a stable identity or formal title. Dolphin (t) 11:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.