Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clientid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clientid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not seeing significant coverage in reliable, independent sources per WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This protocol is only at the internet draft RFC stage, e.g., [1] and there is very little documentation out there for this particular email authentication scheme. Too soon at best. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 09:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It should be noted, that there are many email clients that now support this protocol, including notable listings, such as emClient, SaneBox, BlueMail, Thunderbird and more. There are also more email servers that are starting to implement this as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizardtower (talk • contribs) 15:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Mark viking. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 03:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.