Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland Brown(female)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was alas, DELETE. Would that it were verifiable. Babajobu 17:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Brown(female)[edit]

another nn slang thing-- -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 02:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wow, this must be made up. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can see this being not made up, but I can't see this being an encyclopedia article. Ruby 02:31, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. While I can't vouch that this is made up, there's nothing in the article offering verifiability or notability. -Rebelguys2 04:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NFT. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 05:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nn neologism, original research, unverifiable, all of the above? Grandmasterka 05:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the far more popular "butterface" doesn't have an article, either (previously deleted). -- Kjkolb 06:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable, non-notable, original research. Was this created by the same guys that created Hogging et al? Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-25 10:46Z
Delete Can't be verified.--Adam ^(talk) 16:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as complete bollocks. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 20:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn and unverifiable. --Lockley 05:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-verifiable content. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Might be keepable if verified about analysis in academic context.--ragesoss 06:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.