Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CleveMed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CleveMed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe notable or maybe not, the article is rather promotional either way and my searches found nothing to suggest immediate improvement here, here, here, here, here and here. Considering this is from December 2008 with hardly any significant edits, I hope we can get a consensus. Notifying Ukexpat for comment. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Looks a little borderline to me. I have no further comment - my involvement was limited to moving the article into draft space and then some post-move clean up after the draft was accepted by someone else. ukexpat (talk) 12:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; can't find extensive coverage about this. Fails GNG and CORP. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.