Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cletus Dixon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cletus Dixon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alex declined this PROD to be disruptive, as best I can tell. The individual is not notable. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Four league championships is notable. That mixed with his other jobs and accomplishments, including being a big league scout, make his article keepable. Alex (talk) 01:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to have received significant coverage for his baseball career. A search of google books produces 61 results, several with significant coverage of Dixon. E.g., this one. Also a good deal of newspaper coverage of him including bio sketch here, article on selection as Univ. Chicago baseball captain, here, here, here, here, here, here. Cbl62 (talk) 05:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Four league championships in professional baseball. Four. Doesn't matter what level, that's notability right there for you. Enjoy your trout. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep .. fairly accomplished and the sourcing appears to be there. Spanneraol (talk) 14:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn per sourcing, WP:SNOW, and to clear out the backlog of current deletion nominations. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Four Championships is extreemly notable, also well sourced, tag for rescue. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.