Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clemta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP scope_creep^Talk 13:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - no comment on notability but this reads like an advert Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, small company that does not pass GNG let alone NCORP. It does read close to an advert, to the point that my copyviodar is up.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe even speedy as advert on a non-notable startup. The first two sources are RS, but don't even mention the company name. The rest are non-RS, so don't count. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.