Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemen Chiang (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. WP:SK2; nominator has been checkuser blocked and nobody has !voted other than to keep. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clemen Chiang[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, not well sourced with truly reliable sources Weißer Storch (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources about his public impact. The nominator should be more specific about the reasons for this AfD, since this issue of sources was already brought in the previous one and the sources mentioned there were not challenged. As for a supposed promotional nuance, I don't know what to say, it seems pretty matter-of-fact to me. Manzzoku (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.