Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear Paddock Creek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn by nominator with no delete !votes present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Paddock Creek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, no clear notion of notability, no assertion of importance. Razor flame 23:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It being a geographical feature is an assertion of notability. A geographical feature (see WP:NGEO) that has received a fair amount of coverage beyond statistics and coordinates, generally for its rehabilitation. [1][2]and it appears a seven page chapter is devoted to this creek in this book. It also appears Environmental Trust (New South Wales) wrote an entire book on this creek. [3][4]. The Fairfield, New South Wales City Council also devoted public significant coverage to this. [5] It was inappropriate to nominate this article for deletion within one day of its creation [6] and is a case of WP:BITE. --Oakshade (talk) 02:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oakshade said it all. Geographic features described in reliable sources are presumed to be notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- As per the above, I'd like to withdraw this nomination, if possible. Razor flame 04:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.