Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleanaer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G4 by Orangemike, non-admin closure. Jimmi Hugh (talk) 14:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanaer

This article has been deleted three times. The first deletion was requested in late July by its author, JBP44 (talk · contribs). The second edition, posted in early August by Alements (talk · contribs), and the third, posted this week by JBP44, were both deleted as per WP:CSD#G11: blatant advertising. I undeleted it after JBP44's complaint on my talk page and, although I considered referring JBP44 to the Wikipedia:Deletion review process, listed it here for wider exposure. — Athaenara ✉ 19:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As the third admin to delete the article, I came in late. I support deletion because the only sources not directly related to the company seem not to be independent or reliable: see Accurizer's 22:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC) edit summary (www.allergyuk.org reference seems to be limited to mfr.-supplied information only). — Athaenara ✉ 19:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In re notability: a web search for a few key terms (Cleanaer, LiquidIons, Atrium Innovation) yielded very few hits, none of which were non-commercial. — Athaenara ✉ 22:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.