Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean sheet
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Shutout#Association_Football. MBisanz talk 03:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Clean sheet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article gives nothing more than a definition of the term 'clean sheet.' No notability is asserted or established; page has been tagged 'unreferenced' for more than a year; two 'references' do nothing more than establish that the term exists (which was never in doubt) Drmies (talk) 04:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteJust a dictionary item. It could be mentioned in football strategy.Steve Dufour (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep an important term in football terminology. The article needs improving & sourcing, not deleting. GiantSnowman 16:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge Its not enough to have it on it's own. We use to have Football (soccer) terminology but that must of been deleted and redirected to Association football. There is very little of what you can add to a page which is just about a clean sheet. Govvy (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as wikionary has a much better and shorter decrisption of this. Plus, this article is basically a longer version of the linked dict term. --Numyht (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - just a football slang term of no real encyclopaedic notability. - fchd (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to Shutout - no use having different articles on the same subject. The shutout article even accounts for the term already. matt91486 (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge any useful content to Shutout, and then redirect to the same article in order to comply with the GFDL. – PeeJay 22:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect - To Shutout#Association_Football, doesn't warrant an article specifically for usage in soccer. Sunderland06 (talk) 04:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.