Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean Up the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up the World[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable especially given its current state (and Ian Kiernan and Kim McKay articles are also in need of improvement) and the best my searches found was this, this, this and this and there may be more sources but this all is simply not convincing me. This has exited since April 2007 when the author with the group's name started and it seems to have gotten some other connected changes since then but never anything meaningfully convincing and this article may have even been forgotten given its age and history. Pinging past users Kinu and Mean as custard, environmentalist Velella and also DGG who may be interested to comment. SwisterTwister talk 07:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Advert for unnotable entity. . . Mean as custard (talk) 08:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pure promotionalism, and nnot notable enough to be worth a rewrite. DGG ( talk ) 10:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.