Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claymation Courtyard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claymation Courtyard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable selfreleased album. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. VanEman (talk) 03:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable enough. Daniel Kenneth (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. Doesn't pass WP:NALBUM. DarthVader (talk) 09:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to Buckethead discography - I admit that my main drive to find sources and weigh in is because I hate to see AfD outcomes based only on insubstantial !votes. Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I did not find enough. The only one to speak of is this one at Metal Archives, but otherwise there's not enough out there to satisfy WP:NALBUM. Pretty standard practice to redirect a non-notable album title to the artist (or discography) page, though. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - not notable enough for standalone. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable as a piece of music. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.