Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Salgues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is Salgues does not meet the GNG based on accessible sourcing. If someone wants to incubate in draft space, just ping. Star Mississippi 03:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Salgues[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following a recent RfC, the Fed Cup was removed from WP:NTENNIS and therefore Salgues no longer has automatic notability. Also worth mentioning that she only played in regional group games in 2002 Fed Cup Americas Zone and 2003 Fed Cup Americas Zone according to BJK Cup rather than the latter stages of the tournament. The 10K doubles tournaments don't confer notability either.

I conducted a few searches and found mostly database and stats coverage. Google and DDG returned no useful results. WP:GNG does not appear to be met on current evidence. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This player meets the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines. A tennis player is presumed notable if he/she:

Has competed in one of the international team competitions: Billie Jean King Cup vs fed cup, Davis Cup, Hopman Cup or World Team Cup. User:Vecihi91^{User talk:Vecihi91} 19:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delte there is not sourcing to the level of meeting GNG. It is also high time we drop all notability guidelines that say that just because someone was in a competition we will keep the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ This rule still applies so it's ridiculous to be nominated for deletion.User:Vecihi91^{User talk:Vecihi91} 13:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Sports SNGs require thatthe subject meets GNG, which is not the case here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines is a WikiProject essay and not an official policy or guideline. The fact that this article fails the SNG (WP:NTENNIS) and general notability (WP:GNG) is way more important. Do you have any significant coverage of this player at all? I've struck your second vote. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Vecihi91 do you have any evidence of significant coverage for Salgues? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.