Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Montano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Montano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic does not look to be notable. References either only have a passing mention or are connected to the subject. (eg lacasting). Acting only seems to be in minor roles. Article is also written in peacock language, and is promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord what a mass of (self)-promotion. Gnews yields zero results for this particular person by that name. Utterly fails GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The tone is totally unencyclopedic and over promotional. This might be overcome if there was some substance, but there is not. Montano has been a bit part actress, specializing in unnamed roles. The commercials and music videos do not add up. The list of political candidates she has supported may sound impressive, but it is unclear anything she did to support them makes her notable. In fact it is not clear what she did to support them at all. Said she did? that is not notable. donated to their campaigns? Generally not notable. Montano may well be a nice lady, but she does not pass our standard for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Reads like a CV and full of puffery. I can find insufficient reliable, independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.