Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Jean McCabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Jean McCabe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of an artist, which states and single-sources the fact that she exists but fails to contain any actual substance beyond the fact that she exists. There's the generic claim that she's "award-winning", which is enough of a claim of significance to stave off speedy deletion, but the article fails to name or source what award(s) she purportedly won. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which an artist becomes entitled to have an article just because she exists -- an actual notability claim, and the reliable sourcing to support it, have to be present for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's a mention of her here, she made the cover to Joel Baetz (2009). Canadian Poetry from World War I: An Anthology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-543171-1., and she's mentioned in Repère (in French). Vol. 2. Services documentaires Multimedia. 2005. pp. 1435–., but that's about it. Fails [[WP:GNG]]/[[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:NARTIST]], del per policy. — Sam Sailor 04:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 05:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 05:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 05:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable painter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant sources found that would establish WP:GNG. BTW, John Pack Lambert, have you considered including a reason in your comment now and then, instead of just "non-notable"? Just curious. 198.58.162.176 (talk) 05:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is nothing in the article to give a hint to notability, and I am not finding enough to establish notability as an artist or under WP:GNG from the links at the top of the page. Perhaps this is a case of WP:TOOSOON.—CaroleHenson (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.