Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Le Péron
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No discussion in one month. WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Claude Le Péron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a musician (bassist, backing vocals), in which the only claim for notability is that the subject is touring and recording with notable musicians for centuries - this fails WP:MUSICBIO. Did not find any other sources beyond trivial coverage, not even in the subjects article on fr.wiki, where the only source is myspace. Ben Ben (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources - well he gets mentions in anecdotes of the Goldman biography, chances are Voulzy and Alain Souchon's bios have similar. And he's part of the Goldman band revival group backing French-Welsh singer Michael Jones. What do we expect, he's a bassist and been around for centuries. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 02:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.