Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classmates (1986 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Classmates (1986 film)

Non-notable porn film. Tatarian (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Tatarian (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep (with regrets) It does have coverage [1], and the film is referred to as a "classic" [2][3] by its industry, and they should know. Sigh. Yikes. Suggest a rename to "Classmates (1986 porn film)" Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Schmidt's sources. Multiple reliable sources make it an easy keep, no weak needed. (could you put them in as externals?). I am neutral on moving to the new name, which could be done outside the AFD anyway. PHARMBOY (TALK) 00:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay.. I just did so... and feel dirty. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.