Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classes of Rubies of Eventide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Classes of Rubies of Eventide[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic fails WP:GNG with no reliable, secondary, in-depth sources covering the scope of "list of Rubies of Eventide classes". The contents are WP:GAMECRUFT and individual classes do not have reliable sources covering them. The fact that the game has an abundance of classes can be sourced (for example, [1]), but this content can be included as prose in the parent article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As nominator states, this doesn't belong here. It would be more appropriate at Wikia. If there weren't 106 classes, it might be possible to merge something to the main article, but I just can't see it in this case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Entire content is inappropriate per WP:VGSCOPE. I'm surprised this page went unnoticed for such a long time... --The1337gamer (talk) 11:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.