Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Rushbrook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Rushbrook[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. With multiple major roles in BBC tv and radio productions (see eg [1], [2], [3], [4]) she easily meets WP:ENT #1. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Clearly notable. A very recognisable face on British TV. WP:ENT defines notability as "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". A quick look at her imdb page will demonstrate how she meets that criteria. Incidentally, just "not notable" is not an good argument for deletion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:ENT. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Extensive career meets WP:ENT. It was easy to find that the actress' work has made it into the enduring record and is easily verifiable. Not knowing if the nom researched her or not, what can be stated is that notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation within an article. We do not delete notable topics for lack of effort, and this one can be fixed over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable actress who currently has opening credits billing in The Fades. No good reason given for proposed deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. With that many credits, you need a better reason than "Not notable" to ever consider a deletion debate. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.