Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Hagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Hagan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No major roles to indicate automatic notability under WP:NACTOR. Doesn't appear to meet GNG either. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As it stands, qualifies for WP:BLPPROD as an unsourced biography. Also very non-neutral. (Non-neutrality would warrant changing the tone if it were properly sourced, but it isn't. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete just doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for actors. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable actor and not enough reliable sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rody19901504 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Also, Wikipedia is not for self-promotion. Citobun (talk) 11:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly self promotion. Not enough sources. I can easily find about 10 different actors being way more notable and not having wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.216.197 (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. I was about to remove a couple of sentences as a copyvio of her IMDB bio, but then again, the actor is the author of that bio, and she's presumably written this WP bio, too. So not a copyvio (and we don't know how long the IMDB bio has been online; the WP article may the older). Schwede 66 08:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

that still makes it a copyvio... unless attributed as creative commons, which to my knowledge IMDB is not. Insert CleverPhrase Here 10:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Schwede66. The subject might have good sources in the future. The current state of the article and my inability to churn up RS result in a delete being suggested by me out here. Lourdes 05:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete so poorly formatted as to not be an article, plus all the ^above. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 23:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.