Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciudad Losada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 01:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ciudad Losada[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After I created Jesús Enrique Lossada Municipality and was looking for the corresponding Wikidata item, I found that another user (now blocked) had created this stub on the same municipality back in 2007. I did not find it earlier because "Ciudad Lossada" (i.e., Lossada City) is not the name for this municipality; rather, it's the name of a sector (i.e., neighbourhood) in the nearby city of Maracaibo (Google Maps), most notable for being the site of a failed urban housing project. (Coverage in Spanish: [1], [2])

Redirecting "Ciudad Losada" to Jesús Enrique Lossada Municipality would therefore be misleading. It would also be wrong. Aside from the spelling mistake, I have not seen any source call this mostly rural municipality a city. It is definitely not a city in the formal sense: according to the Spanish Wikipedia, cities in Venezuela must have fewer than 25% of their population working in agriculture.

Given there is no need to leave a redirect, and there is nothing really left to merge to the article I wrote, I propose a simple deletion. Cobblet (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Cobblet (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think a redirect would be terrible, but this is clearly wrong and needs to be deleted. SportingFlyer T·C 22:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to clear things up. Balle010 (talk) 04:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.