Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citation needed (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Citation found. (non-admin closure) 💜 melecie talk - 00:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

This article doesn't have a single Citation, which is pathetic.^{[Where's my citation already?]}^[4-1] Epicgenius (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and..? this article is "citation needed", not "citation found". 💜 melecie talk - 04:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Self-reference. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
^{[citation needed]} ^{[citation needed]}. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 19:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.