Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cishet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cishet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:NOTDIC Irakakiku (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently working on expanding the article to make it less dictionary-like. --MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 04:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the article stands at the moment, it is simply a dictionary entry. I don't see that there is much space to expand this into an entire article. So delete, though if MorbidEntree improves the article as he promises, then the article may be keepable. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 07:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. At maximum, it worth mentioning if in Cisgender article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I researched all over for sources and content to add to the article, but found nothing better than tumblr rants and information posts. I can't expand the article any further using reliable sources, so I say delete as well. --MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 17:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Agree on delete and on including a small blurb in a related article. Sickhypnotic (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.