Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circumflex (web framework)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Circumflex (web framework)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence either in the article (which has been tagged for over a year) or found through searches to establish that this framework is notable. AllyD (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete no evidence. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nomination. I couldn't find any RSes either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability, no reliable source coverage found for this software, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.