Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circuit Check

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Circuit Check[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. No indication that this company is notable. Google Books only gives directory entries for this company,no discussion of the company in any books, sources are trade magazine articles and don't discuss the company itself. Wtshymanski (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article was/is close to meeting the deletion criteria, but disagree about the company's notoriety falling below the cutoff threshold. Two references have been added since the initial nomination, one being specifically about the company, and being written by a huge, highly-notable industry figure. RCHenningsgard 18:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.