Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Punkmorten 21:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable nelogism. This "religion" produces zero Google hits. Article makes no claim of any sort of following. PROD tag was removed without explanation by User:AkiShinji, the sole contributor. Portions of the article appear to be near-copyvios from http://circism.info.se/ -Elmer Clark 20:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following pages as they are concepts unique to this religion:
- Okay, I would agree about that you may delete the last two, but I see no reason why you should delete Circism. Why I removed PROD? When someone added that, the article was in a new state where there was like no information. I thought it meant all they wanted was information. So I saw no reason for that mark when I had written many more lines. It's a lot of text on that page, I think that article's quite good. AkiShinji 21:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is a perfectly good treatment of the subject, the problem is that the subject is not notable. It returns zero relevant Google hits and the article makes no claims that a significant number of people adhere to the religion. See WP:Notability and WP:NFT. -Elmer Clark 21:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I would agree about that you may delete the last two, but I see no reason why you should delete Circism. Why I removed PROD? When someone added that, the article was in a new state where there was like no information. I thought it meant all they wanted was information. So I saw no reason for that mark when I had written many more lines. It's a lot of text on that page, I think that article's quite good. AkiShinji 21:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very much a WP:NFT product. -- RHaworth 21:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Nonsense. --InShaneee 22:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I tried hard to find true notability and regret I failed. Prove me wrong and I'll change my input. Fiddle Faddle 22:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 23:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cruft's as above. Wikipedia content is edited mercilessly per definition. User:Yy-bo 22:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As RHaworth pointed out, just because you made something up, doesn't mean it should be on Wikipedia Lijnema 22:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.