Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema Shares

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I looked at the sources added and nothing convinces me that this subject meets WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 18:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema Shares[edit]

Cinema Shares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article about Cinema Shares is unreferenced and not notable. It was active from 1970 to 1986. No source to prove that it had released films that received a G rating. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Hayleez (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have found several citations in Google Books and added. There are many more, so I believe this company is notable. Lesliechin1 (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Run n Fly (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. This article has only one sentence of prose, and I'm not sure how accurate that one sentence is. "Cinema Shares International Distribution was an American company that released localized English versions of films produced outside of the United States, often sanitizing their content to receive a G rating." While IMDb does indicate that this company was a film distributor (see [1]), it also indicates that this company released a lot more R-rated films than G-rated films, and of the three G-rated films listed by IMDb, two of them were originally in English and thus would not have needed to be "localized". Can anyone with access to the cited sources provide quotations from them to indicate what they say about Cinema Shares releasing "localized English versions" and "often sanitizing their content"? Distributing films such as The Killer Is on the Phone and Die Sister, Die! wouldn't have made them known for marketing films toward family audiences. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This was a real film distributor, but there's not enough verifiable information here to justify an article. However, if better sourcing and more information are located in the future, I would support the re-creation of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.