Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Christmas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per clear consensus. Michig (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Christmas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of author whose notability is marginal. Google search shows this Wikipedia article and advertisements for her books and poetry, but no independent reviews. Recommend a Soft Delete so that a neutral editor can write a BLP about her if they can establish notability. However, this article is not a useful start and can be blown up. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotion. No suitable sources. Hard delete, with no suitable sources, there is nothing her to start a proper article with. At best WP:TNT applies, ~~should~~ in the unlikely event that notability-attesting sources be discovered. Refer to WP:NAUTHOR. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC) underlined added 02:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No TNT, no revisions. Sources are ultra-weak and promotional. I removed poemhunter.com source, which was a wiki-style author profile presumably controlled by article subject. GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG, have been unable to find anything useable, appears to be a prolific self publisher of poetry that has not been picked up in wikinotable places, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, reminder for budding authors, especially for ones who are tempted to write their own wikiarticle (hello Cindychris33:)) - WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, fails significant coverage --DannyS712 (talk) 06:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for self promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Soft delete per WP:TNT. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the points made already to delete and can't add anything useful Legacypac (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.