Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciel Airlines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 08:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciel Airlines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another proposed and failed airline project. It vanished again without having operated any flights. Fails WP:CORP because there is no reliable third-party coverage. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page out of exaxtly the same reasons:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Planned-only companies are inherently non-notable unless there is a specific reason and substantial third party coverage to make such a company especially notable - which I cannot find in this case. Travelbird (talk)

Delete per nom. SmartSE (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.