Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cici Chen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cici Chen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete She is no longer seen with Fairchild TV--Hipposcrashed (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipposcrashed: The 2012 AFD never got anywhere, do you intend on re-nominating now? Iffy★Chat -- 15:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but nominator's statement isn't the reason. The rule is not that television personalities keep articles as long as they're still in the same job and then get deleted once they leave it; if a person was properly sourced as having been notable in the first place, then they stay notable forever. Even dead people stay notable permanently as long as they were notable in life. Rather, the real problem here is actually that Cici Chen was never properly sourced as notable under our rules for television personalities in the first place, relying entirely on a single piece of media content which is now a dead link and wasn't properly cited in the first place (media citations have to include the title of the content and the date on which it was published, people!) — so it is impossible to determine whether it was substantively about her, or just glancingly namechecked her existence in the process of not actually being about her. Nothing here is actually a strong enough notability claim to exempt her from having to have much better sourcing than this, and it's irrelevant whether she's still in the same job today or not. Bearcat (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the pageants she won are not at a level to make her notable nor have her roles in television been such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable as a host and the two pageants that she has won is not notable event.Ms.bletvok (talk) 22:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.