Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciaran Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciaran Connell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources.Meatsgains^(talk) 16:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I get scattered hits on the company, none for this fellow. Article reads like a Linked in resume, not GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this "business expert" does not meet our notability criteria for GNG. Netherzone (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Man doing his job. Completely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 21:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Subject fails WP:GNG. The article should be draftified if not deleted. Suasufzeb 12:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article does not meet notability requirements. NMasiha (talk) 19:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Paul W (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.