Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Saint Nicholas, Kistanje
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Church of Saint Nicholas, Kistanje (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim to notability other than it exists. Church is only 9 years old so no historical footprint to measure notability either. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)][reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable church with no good coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete link is busted, unable to verify at this time. Would change my position if information provided (and passess notability). Some churches are notable, I cannot determine if this one is or is not.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability, the only ref link is dead. For a "second" Catholic church serving a village of 3000 inhabitants it is also unlikely to be notable. --ELEKHHT 22:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.