Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of God (Full Gospel) in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Church of God (Full Gospel) in India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD tagged for promotion, however the article has a history going back some 10 years give or take, and as such I feel an afd is better here just in case a previous version looks to be salvageable. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 00:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- However bad the article, this is about a denomination, so that we should have an article on it. If an old version is better, you should revert to it. This is not a case for AFD. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft and Userfy actually as my searches found a few links so far but this is all still so questionable and is best put elsewhere where it can be improved until it's acceptable for the mainspace. SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 12:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; non-minor denominations are considered notable. Stubbing a bad article about a notable topic is generally considered appropriate; I don't see why we couldn't do that here. Nyttend (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.