Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukka boot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). Unanimous consensus discusses the subject's coverage in reliable sources that demonstrate its notability. WilliamH (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chukka boot[edit]

Delete unsourced one-liner about a nn footwear Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 17:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of coverage in reliable sources demonstrates notability. --Beloved Freak 18:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I had never heard of the boots before yesterday morning, but when the article Chukka (which used to be a redirect to Polo) was changed [1] I looked up the word and found several references to the Chukka boot, so created the stub. I was interrupted before adding any sources, and forgot to come back and finish editing the stub, for which I'm sorry. :-( Sources have been added now, by Belovedfreak. --Bonadea (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand: Chukka boots refer to particular style of boots, not neccessarily to a specific brand. Vans, in particular, are one company that has had a very successful line of Chukka boots. Go to any online shoe store, and you will easily find scores of Chukka boots from many different manufacturers.I feel like a tourist (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Plenty notable and as well sourced as we could wish for a footwear article. Ford MF (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Also known as boondockers, as anyone who has been through Navy boot camp can tell you. This style of boot has been around for decades, if not longer. DarkAudit (talk) 22:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball keep. Well sourced and clearly notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.