Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Porter (Advertising Executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Porter (Advertising Executive)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy biography of a PR man, article is a clone of a userspace draft edited by an IP from the firm headed by the article subject.The 2(?) editors working on the article are both SPA's, as is the (3rd?) editor who created the userspace draft. WuhWuzDat 07:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only one of the sources even grazes notability. Mangoe (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree there's not enough here to pass WP:BIO test. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 16:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above. We need a lot more sourcing to satisfy policy, and I'm not finding any. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 21:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.