Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Bueche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that notability is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Bueche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG which is WP:VG notability guideline. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 17:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep. Probably passes GNG. Being part of the founding team of Origin Systems, including a portrayal in Ultima tends to generate SIGCOV. e.g. [1][2][3]. Should be a whole bunch of 80s and 90s hits in newspaper archives. Icewhiz (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – there are plenty of mentions-in-passing in current news articles, and I'm sure that newspaper archives will show more significant coverage. He even has a Lifetime Achievement Award named after him [4], so it's highly unlikely such coverage does not exist. Bradv🍁 18:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.