Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Megalou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole keep argument is not a particularly full-throated one. A Train^talk 17:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christos Megalou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece created by someone working for his bank. Subject does not meet WP:GNG. Only routine coverage and quotes. No significant, in depth coverage in WP:RS. Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I am the recent changes patrol who reported the creator of the article to WP:UAA. The individual is the CEO of a large corporation and is the subject of online coverage, therefore meeting WP:N, but the level of notability established in the article is weak. The article reads more like a resume than an encyclopedia article. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 00:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- just a CV & no value to the project. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with user K.e.coffman. The Greek article on the same person has been already deleted as lacking notability (see el:Χρήστος Μεγάλου). ——Chalk19 (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.