Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Whyborn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Cambridgeshire County Cricket Club List A players. Sandstein 07:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Whyborn[edit]

Christopher Whyborn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Cambridgeshire County Cricket Club List A players Has played 1 List A game, but I couldn't find any significant coverage. Sources may exists locally or offline though. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where a player with one or a few matches, but no coverage, is redirected/deleted and a suitable WP:ATD exists here. Another that should have been BOLDly redirected though. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete another in a very long line of articles that do not meet GNG. GNG is the minimum requirement to have any article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.