Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Waziri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Waziri[edit]

Christopher Waziri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite passing WP:NFOOTY, the lack of resources for this player (most being brief) means this player fail WP:GNG. HawkAussie (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there is longstanding consensus that comprehensively failing GNG is far more important than a technical pass of NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - he just about passes NFOOTBALL with 18 appearances; if he doesn't make any further appearances and retires then it might be worth bringing this back for further discussion but I see no reason to delete the article when he still has an active career Spiderone 22:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.